CarcinogenicityAccepted
No carcinogenicity studies for chronic therapy; weight-of-evidence assessment instead
Why: Weight-of-evidence assessment per ICH S6(R1) showed low risk; approved complement inhibitors had no carcinogenicity studies · Within the guideline · Weight of evidence
“The applicant’s claim that the weight-of-evidence assessment of carcinogenic potential was done in line with the ICH S6 (R1) and that it showed a low cancerogenic risk of sutimlimab is accepted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗ “CDER’s Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee’s (ECAC) concurred with the reviewer’s assessment. Thus, further characterization of the carcinogenic potential for sutimlimab is not warranted at this time.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 26Source ↗ DARTAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No fertility study; male spermatogenic cycle not examined in sexually immature monkeys, so male fertility effects unknown
Why: Reproductive organs evaluated in repeat-dose studies; gap reflected in the SmPC · Weight of evidence
“Due to sexual immaturity of male animals, examination of the spermatogenic cycle was not conducted. Therefore, effects on male fertility remain unknown for sutimlimab. This has been adequately reflected in the SmPC.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗