Safety marginVerdict not stated
Hypersensitivity reactions in the 26-week monkey study at all doses, at 0.7-6 times clinical exposure
Why: Attributed to foreign recognition of the humanised antibody in monkeys · No relevant species
“In a 26 week cynomolgus monkey study, hypersensitivity reactions were noted and attributed to the foreign recognition of the humanised antibody in cynomolgus monkeys (0.7-6 times the clinical exposure based on Cmax and AUC at steady state after weekly administration of 5, 25, and 50 mg/kg).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ GLPAccepted
Bioanalytical method validation for monkey serum not performed under GLP
Why: Method validated per FDA bioanalytical guidance and best industry practice valid at the time · Within the guideline
“The validations of the bioanalysis methods used for quantification of obinutuzumab in Cynomolgus monkey serum were not performed according to GLP.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ “However, the analytical method was validated according to the guidance valid at the time of study performance, which was consistent with the FDA Guidance on Bioanalytical Method Validation and best industry practices (Kelley M et al. 2007, Viswanathan CT et al. 2007) with regards to the tested validation parameters and pre-defined acceptance criteria; thus, the lack of GLP compliance of the bioanalysis validation was considered acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ BiodistributionAcceptedBeyond the letter
In vivo distribution of obinutuzumab not studied
Why: CD20 tissue expression characterised; limited distribution beyond plasma; no off-target binding in human tissue cross-reactivity · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The in vivo distribution of obinutuzumab has not been studied. This is deemed acceptable due to 1) the fact that obinutuzumab is specific for CD20 whose tissue expression is characterized 2) the fact that pharmacokinetic data indicate limited distribution beyond the plasma compartment and 3) the human cross-reactivity study indicates no potential for off-target binding.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ OtherAccepted
No dedicated single-dose toxicity studies; acute effects assessed after the first dose in repeat-dose monkey studies
Why: Repeat-dose study results address acute toxicity per ICH M3(R2) · Within the guideline
“According to ICH guidance M3(R2), the results of these studies are considered appropriate to address acute toxicity aspects. Therefore, the lack of dedicated single-dose toxicity studies was considered acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ OtherQuestioned
In vitro cytokine release assay did not test immobilized antibody
“Reviewer’s comment: This assay did not include a set of experiments using immobilized antibodies. By not doing, the assay may not adequately mimic the in vivo conditions that may give rise to cytokine release.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 112Source ↗