SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
No binding-affinity screen in non-rodent species other than monkey to select the toxicology species
Why: Cynomolgus monkey shown relevant by binding and functional data; addressed in scientific advice · No relevant species · Other reason
“Apparently, binding affinity studies for another non-rodent species than non-human primates (NHP) were not conducted, which would normally be expected in order to include/exclude relevant species.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ “However, as also addressed in a scientific advice (EMA/SA/0000049032), the lack of such assessment is accepted since the cynomolgus monkey, based on binding affinity and functional in vitro data, is considered an appropriate and relevant species for toxicology evaluation and studies in this species were already conducted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAccepted
No carcinogenicity studies for a chronic autoimmune therapy; weight-of-evidence assessment instead
Why: No cross-reactivity with rodent FcRn; WoE per ICH S6(R1) shows no increased carcinogenic risk · Within the guideline · No relevant species · Weight of evidence
“Nipocalimab is a mAb which does not cross-react with rodent FcRn, precluding the conduct of traditional carcinogenicity studies. In line with ICH guideline S6(R1) and based on a WoE approach it was concluded that nipocalimab does not pose an increased carcinogenic risk.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗ “Overall, the carcinogenic potential has been adequately addressed and it is considered that the WoE submitted by the applicant lends support to the conclusion that the carcinogenic potential of nipocalimab is unlikely.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ DARTCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Fertility assessed in 26-week monkey study using sexually immature animals; no specialised fertility assessments
Why: Overall evidence does not indicate concerns regarding effects on fertility · Weight of evidence
“The used strategy is supported, but the monkeys used in the 26-week study were sexually immature (2-3 years of age) at study start which is not in line with the guideline.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗ “The available evidence does not indicate any concerns regarding potential effects on fertility.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ DARTCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Monkey ePPND dosing started on GD45, missing early organogenesis
Why: IgG transfer is limited during organogenesis and increases in the foetal period in monkeys and humans · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The late start of nipocalimab dosing on GD45 is not in accordance with current guidance and limits the opportunity to evaluate potential effects on early organogenesis.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ “In line with the applicant’s justification, dosing from GD45 is considered valid to assess the potential effects of nipocalimab on prenatal development because transfer of IgG is limited during organogenesis and increases during the foetal period through the end of gestation in both monkeys and humans.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗