SpeciesQuestioned
No relevant species for eculizumab; all toxicology in mice with surrogate anti-mouse C5 antibody BB5.1, cross-reactivity profile not compared
Why: Surrogate antibody specifically binds mouse C5
“Toxicological studies were performed in mice using a surrogate murine anti-mouse C5 antibody (BB5.1 mAb). BB5.1 mAb specifically binds to mouse C5 but there was no information on whether the cross-reactivity profile of BB5.1 mAb with normal mouse tissues is similar to the cross-reactivity profile of eculizumab with normal human tissues.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 11Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAccepted
No safety pharmacology studies; pharmacodynamics characterised in vitro only
Why: Species specificity; in vitro approach acceptable per CHMP scientific advice and ICH S7 · No relevant species · Within the guideline
“No specific nonclinical safety pharmacology studies have been conducted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 8Source ↗ “As stated in the CHMP scientific advice and in accordance with ICH S7, the approach to characterize the pharmacodynamic properties of eculizumab by in vitro methods is considered as acceptable in the light of the species specificity.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 11Source ↗ CarcinogenicityVerdict not stated
No carcinogenicity studies for a chronic indication; reliance on absence of proliferative findings in the 26-week surrogate mouse study
Why: No proliferative activity in the 26-week surrogate study
“Carcinogenicity studies have not been performed with eculizumab or any surrogate anti-C5 antibodies. The 26-week repeat dose toxicity study with a murine anti-mouse C5 antibody (BB5.1mAb) showed no cytotoxic or proliferative activities suggestive of carcinogenic risk at dose levels up to 60 mg/kg/week, i.e. a dose level showing significant inhibition of C5 activation.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 9Source ↗ GLPVerdict not stated
Mouse plasma clearance study with an eculizumab variant run non-GLP with unvalidated methods
“Methods used in the plasma clearance study were not validated. The plasma clearance study was performed as a non-GLP research study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 8Source ↗