SpeciesAccepted
No pharmacologically relevant toxicology species (only chimpanzee binds); monkey toxicity study in a non-relevant species
Why: Only chimpanzee binds CD38, not appropriate for toxicity studies; no adequate transgenic mouse model available · No relevant species · Within the guideline
“The used species for toxicity testing, cynomolgous monkey, was not regarded a pharmacological relevant species as the antibody does not recognise the target in this species.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗ “The FDA concurs with the conclusion that no pharmacologically relevant animal species is available for the safety assessment (e.g., in vivo safety pharmacology or toxicology studies) of isatuximab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 50Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No reproductive toxicity studies; literature weight-of-evidence on CD38 in reproduction and development instead
Why: No pharmacologically relevant species for an embryo-fetal study · No relevant species · Weight of evidence · Within the guideline
“The FDA's Assessment: Due to the lack of an appropriate pharmacologically relevant animal species, the evaluation of embryofetal development of isatuximab is based on a weight of evidence (WOE) assessment in lieu of conducting studies in animals.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 60Source ↗ Efficacy modelCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
In vivo proof of concept only in a subcutaneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma xenograft, not a myeloma model
Why: Model still provides evidence of anti-tumour effect towards CD38 · Pharmacology or kinetics
“Notwithstanding the limitations of the model: whether the use of an NHL cell line is representative for the proposed indication (MM), the model not fully simulating a systemic tumour, the extent of mediated cytotoxicity as this model lacks T and B cells, this study provides evidence for the anti-tumour effect of isatuximab towards CD38.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗