DARTAccepted
No reproductive toxicity studies; EGFR knockout literature and cetuximab embryo-fetal data used instead
Why: Surrogate data from cetuximab reproductive study; ICH S9 basis for not requiring additional DART studies · Class precedent · Within the guideline
“In order to investigate the potential effects of incomplete blockade of EGFR signaling with an antibody, the Applicant was able to provide surrogate data by right of reference to the reproductive toxicology study conducted as a post-marketing requirement for the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 61Source ↗ “the CHMP agreed that additional DART studies are not necessary.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No NOAEL in the 26-week monkey study; 5-week NOAEL exposure about equal to human exposure at maximum dose
“In the 5-week study, exposure at the NOAEL dose level (40 mg/kg) was approximately the same as the median exposure expected at the maximum clinical dose level”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗ GLPCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Toxicokinetic and immunogenicity analyses in the repeat-dose toxicity studies not GLP-compliant
Why: Exposure values not critical for the safety evaluation · Other reason
“Lack of GLP status for the TK part is a deficiency that may impact on the conclusions drawn from the toxicity study. However, in this case the exposure values are not considered critical for the safety evaluation.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗ OtherQuestioned
Tissue cross-reactivity study evaluated each tissue in only one species, preventing human-monkey comparison
“While the purpose of tissue-cross-reactivity studies is typically to demonstrate comparability of binding between nonclinical and clinical species, and to potentially identify patterns of drug-related toxicity, in this study, the Applicant chose to evaluate each tissue in only one species, and therefore, it is not possible to conclude that the binding pattern was similar between the two species”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 40Source ↗