CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies; weight-of-evidence risk assessment from chronic monkey data and TSLP literature
Why: No binding to rodent TSLP; weight of evidence shows no product-specific carcinogenicity concern · No relevant species · Weight of evidence
“The conduct of carcinogenicity studies in rodents was not feasible as tezepelumab does not bind to rodents’ TSLP. Therefore, a carcinogenicity risk assessment was conducted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 34Source ↗ “Therefore, given the limitations of the available rodent models and the weight of evidence indicating a lack of product-specific concern for the carcinogenicity potential for tezepelumab, it was determined that additional non-clinical studies would not offer new significant clinically relevant data to inform the risk.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No fertility/early embryonic development study; fertility assessed only via reproductive organs in the 6-month monkey study
Why: Mating studies not practical in cynomolgus monkeys; no adverse effects in 6-month study · No relevant species · Within the guideline
“No development toxicity studies with tezepelumab were conducted to evaluate early embryonic development to implantation as it is not practical to do mating studies in cynomolgus monkeys.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗ “Male and female fertility was indirectly assessed as components of the 6- month repeat-dose study and there were no tezepelumab-related adverse effects.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No surrogate (M702) studies on TSLP role in early pregnancy and placentation
Why: Published mouse results strain-dependent · Other reason
“However, the applicant clarified that studies were not carried out using M702 due to strain-dependence of the results described in the published literature. The lack of studies is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗