DARTAccepted
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies; menstrual cyclicity evaluated within the 39-week monkey study
Why: Reproduction toxicity studies not required for anticancer agents; only possible finding was impaired menstrual cyclicity · Within the guideline · Weight of evidence
“Reproductive and developmental toxicity No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies were performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 12Source ↗ “Based on the repeated dose toxicity study, there are no serious concerns regarding reproductive toxicity as the only alteration possibly related to treatment with cetuximab was an impairment of menstrual cyclicity. Studies of toxicity to reproduction are not required for anticancer agents, since it is assumed that reproductive occurrences are generally expected 81.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 15Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No exposure margin in the 39-week monkey study: low dose (12 then 7.5 mg/kg) equals the human therapeutic dose
“The dosage was based on the human therapeutic starting dose of 400 mg/m2 and subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m2 , which translates to 12 and 7.5 mg/kg for a human ofbody surface area of 1.8 m2 and 60 kg body weight.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 11Source ↗ SpeciesCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Cynomolgus monkey used without data on cetuximab binding affinity to monkey versus human EGFR
Why: Similarity of adverse reactions in monkeys and humans supports the species · Human data
“However, information about the binding affinity of cetuximab to monkey EGFR relative to human EGFR is lacking, and this makes the evaluation of the toxicology findings difficult.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 15Source ↗ “The Cynomolgus monkey was considered an appropriate species for safety testing of cetuximab. The similarity of adverse reactions seen in monkeys and humans supports this notion.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 15Source ↗ OtherAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No nonclinical toxicity studies of co-administration with irinotecan
Why: Commitment to submit clinical combination data from ongoing and planned studies · Human data
“No toxicological studies have investigated the the co-administration of cetuximab and irinotecan. The applicant has committed to submit further clinical data on the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan generated in the ongoing/planned phase III studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 15Source ↗ “Thus, the lack of non-clinical invistigations on the toxicity of co-administration with irinotecan has been adequately justified by the applicant.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 15Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAcceptedBeyond the letter
No specific CNS safety pharmacology studies
Why: Nature of the product, specific receptor targeting and toxicology findings · Low-risk modality · Weight of evidence
“The applicant has submitted a justification for not conducting specific studies on the effects of cetuximab on the CNS. Taking into consideration the nature of the product, the specific receptor targeting, and the findings from the toxicology studies, the justification provided by the applicant is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 14Source ↗