DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No embryo-fetal development studies; literature review of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway reproductive risk instead
Why: Literature-based assessment of reproductive toxicity potential; FDA agreed the approach appeared reasonable · Weight of evidence
“Embryo-fetal development studies were not conducted with cemiplimab. Rather, the Applicant provided a scientific literature review and assessment of the reproductive toxicity potential of cemiplimab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 46Source ↗ “FDA agreed in September 2015 that this approach appeared reasonable.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 46Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No pre- and postnatal development or juvenile studies
Why: Other checkpoint inhibitors already shown to induce abortion and premature delivery in monkeys; agreed at scientific advice · Class precedent
“Since other checkpoint inhibitors have shown to induce abortion and premature delivery in monkeys, the risk is already identified,hence it is acceptable that no studies have been performed to test the potential of cemiplimab for carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, pre and postnatal development and juvenile studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗ “As also discussed during scientific advice, the lack of carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, fertility and pre/post-natal and juvenile development were agreed and are considered acceptable and well justified.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗