CarcinogenicityAccepted
No rodent carcinogenicity studies for long-term use; weight-of-evidence carcinogenicity risk assessment instead
Why: Option afforded by ICH S6 and S1; neutralizing anti-drug antibodies in rodents to lecanemab and its mouse surrogate · Within the guideline · Weight of evidence · No relevant species
“A weight-of-evidence assessment of carcinogenicity risk was conducted considering this possibility afforded by ICH S6 and S1 guidelines instead of conducting 2-years carcinogenicity study in rodents and 6-month Tg Ras study to support long-term human use of lecanemab. The whole approach is supported.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ “On March 19, 2014, the applicant was informed that a carcinogenicity assessment of lecanemab would not be necessary based on the development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies in rodents treated with lecanemab or the mouse surrogate, mAb158.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 11Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: Patients aged 50 years and older; target soluble Aβ aggregates not detectable in standard reproductive toxicology species · Weight of evidence · No relevant species
“This was justified by the applicant according to a weight of evidence approach considering notably that the age of the intended patient population (50 years of age and older). In addition, it was pointed out that standard preclinical models used for the conduct of reproductive and developmental studies are not relevant since the soluble aggregates of Aβ targeted by lecanemab are not detectable in these species.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗ “At the End of Phase 2 meeting (IND 105081, November 6, 2012), the applicant was informed that reproductive and development toxicology studies would not be required to support an application because of the age of the patient population”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 11Source ↗ SpeciesAcceptedBeyond the letter
On-target cerebral microhaemorrhage risk assessed only in non-GLP pharmacology studies in transgenic mice with the murine surrogate mAb158
Why: On-target microhaemorrhage evaluable only in transgenic mice with the surrogate; FDA later no longer required the assessment · No relevant species
“The particularity of the toxicological programme is on-target toxicity evaluation of cerebral microhaemorrhage potential can be conducted only as part of the non-GLP repeated-dose pharmacology studies in transgenic mice (Tg2576 and Tg-APPArcSwe) using the murine monoclonal antibody surrogate.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗ “In a letter from the Division dated July 2, 2014, the applicant was informed that a nonclinical assessment of the potential for lecanemab to cause microhemorrhage would no longer be required.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 11Source ↗