Safety marginVerdict not stated
No NOAEL in the chronic monkey study; lowest dose gave an exposure margin of only 1-2
“No NOAEL was found in this study with animals treated with the lowest dose of 5 mg/kg/week requiring supportive care. This dose provided an exposure-based safety margin of 1-2 to clinically relevant exposure (taking species difference in potency into account).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗ Efficacy modelQuestioned
No proof of principle in the indicated tumour type (unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma)
“A proof of principle specific for the tumour type included in the indication was not demonstrated. Thus, the relevance for the current proposed indication, uHCC, was not provided.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAccepted
No stand-alone safety pharmacology studies; endpoints in monkey toxicity studies; no dedicated CNS study
Why: Per guideline when non-human primate is the only relevant species · Within the guideline · No relevant species
“No stand-alone safety pharmacology studies were conducted for tremelimumab. This is acceptable and according to guideline, especially when non-human primate is the only relevant species.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No pre- and postnatal development or juvenile studies; embryo-fetal study in monkeys only
Why: In line with ICH S9; indication limited to adults · Within the guideline
“Pre- and postnatal development studies were not performed, and this is acceptable and in line with ICH S9. No studies in juvenile animals were performed, and this is acceptable since the sought indication is only including adult patents.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗