CarcinogenicityAccepted
No rodent carcinogenicity bioassay for a chronic IBD therapy; in vitro tumour-cell study with murine homologue Act-1 instead
Why: No pharmacological activity in mice and rats (ICH S6(R1)); weight of evidence indicates no significant carcinogenic potential · Within the guideline · No relevant species · Weight of evidence
“In accordance with ICH Guideline S6(R1), conventional carcinogenicity studies (i.e., rodent bioassays) have not been conducted with MLN0002 to assess its carcinogenic potential as it lacks pharmacological activity in mice and rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 129Source ↗ “Overall, MLN0002 does not appear to have significant carcinogenic potential.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 12Source ↗ DARTAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No fertility studies; 26-week monkey study insufficient to exclude effects on male reproductive organs
Why: Effect on male fertility unlikely; uncertainty stated in the SmPC
“Concerning fertility, the 26 week general toxicity study in monkeys given vedolizumab is judged insufficient to conclude an absence of an effect, although an effect on male fertility is unlikely.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ “However as no definitive conclusion can be drawn on the male reproductive organs in the cynomolgus monkey repeat dose general toxicity study the following wording has been included in the SmPC:”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ Juvenile toxVerdict not stated
No juvenile animal toxicity studies; β7 integrin knockout mouse data used instead
Why: α4β7 integrin plays no role in growth and development; β7 knockout mice suffice to study developmental effects · Pharmacology or kinetics
“Toxicology studies in juvenile animals have not been conducted. The Applicant argued that α4β7 integrin does not play a role in mammalian growth and development (literature references have been provided) and that the developmental effects of inhibiting the α4β7 integrin can be studied sufficiently in mice with genetic ablation of the β7 integrin gene (Itgb7)”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ OtherAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No animal model of PML; CNS immune surveillance tested in a rhesus EAE model instead
Why: PML handled as a potential risk in the RMP with postmarketing monitoring
“However, since EAE is not an animal model of PML; the results of this study do not directly demonstrate that MLN0002 has no potential to cause PML.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 11Source ↗ “The PML risk is considered a potential risk as described in the RMP and will be monitored in the post marketing setting.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAcceptedBeyond the letter
No stand-alone gastrointestinal, urinary, pulmonary or CNS safety pharmacology; endpoints in repeat-dose toxicology studies
“The effects of vedolizumab on the gastrointestinal, urinary, pulmonary and central nervous systems were evaluated for functional and structural changes in GLP-compliant repeat-dose toxicology studies of up to 26 weeks in pharmacologically responsive species. This is acceptable to the CHMP.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 42Source ↗