DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No reproductive or developmental toxicity studies; weight-of-evidence literature risk assessment (CSF-1/CSF-1R deficiency models) instead
Why: Weight-of-evidence risk assessment submitted in place of animal studies · Weight of evidence
“While no animal studies were conducted to assess the reproductive and developmental risks of axatilimab, a WoE-based risk assessment report was submitted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 35Source ↗ “To address the potential effects of axatilimab on embryo-fetal development, the Applicant submitted an assessment of the reproductive and developmental risk using a weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 52Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies; rodent bioassays not relevant
Why: Axatilimab not pharmacologically active in rodents · No relevant species
“Because axatilimab is not active pharmacologically in rodents, conventional carcinogenicity studies in mice or rats are not relevant for axatilimab. The FDA’s Assessment: The FDA concurs.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 52Source ↗