DARTVerdict not stated
No dedicated reproductive and developmental toxicity studies (no embryo-fetal or pre/postnatal studies)
Why: Indicated primarily for male hemophilia patients; clinical program conducted exclusively in males · Other reason
“Dedicated reproductive and developmental toxicology studies were not conducted as concizumab is primarily indicated for use in male patients with hemophilia and the clinical development program was conducted exclusively in males.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 119Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies for a chronic non-oncology indication; weight-of-evidence assessment instead
Why: Not functional in rodents; weight-of-evidence of mode of action, literature, nonclinical and clinical data · Weight of evidence · No relevant species · Human data
“Instead, the Applicant conducted a carcinogenicity risk assessment of concizumab using a weight-of-evidence (WOE) approach that considered the mode of action (MOA), a review of relevant literature and an evaluation of the nonclinical and clinical data.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 120Source ↗ “The Division determined that no additional nonclinical studies assessing the carcinogenic potential of concizumab were warranted for the indications of hemophilia A and hemophilia B and the CDER Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee (ECAC) concurred with the Division’s recommendation.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 120Source ↗ Juvenile toxAccepted
No dedicated juvenile animal studies
Why: Neonatal and infant monkey studies technically challenging and unlikely to identify new reactions · Within the guideline · Other reason
“Dedicated juvenile animal studies have not been conducted with concizumab as studies in neonatal and infant monkeys are technically challenging and are unlikely to identify potential reactions that were not identified from studies in fully developed (adult) animals.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 119Source ↗ “Dedicated juvenile animal studies were not conducted with concizumab, consistent with the guidance provided in ICH M3 (R2)”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 244Source ↗ RecoveryVerdict not stated
Reversibility of vascular findings not assessed in the 52-week monkey study
“The reversibility of the findings in cynomolgus monkeys was not assessed and the NOAEL (0.5 mg/kg/day, 1660 µg.hr/mL AUC0-24, Week 52) represents a 74x exposure margin to the anticipated clinical dose (0.20 mg/kg, 22.4 µg.hr/mL AUC0-24).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 235Source ↗