GLPAcceptedBeyond the letter
Bioanalytical method validations for pivotal toxicity studies not formally GLP
Why: Some studies followed GLP principles such as QA audit; no impact on results · Other reason
“None of the method validations applied in pivotal toxicity studies were formally performed under GLP. It is acknowledged that some of the studies are performed according to GLP principles, e.g. QA audit of different steps of the study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗ “The classification of the studies as non-GLP is not considered to have any impact on the results from the studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗ OtherVerdict not stated
Rodent surrogate antibodies (r13c7, m13c7) used in some studies instead of romosozumab
Why: Romosozumab causes anti-drug antibody formation in rodents
“In some studies, rodent versions of the humanized antibody AMG785 (rat 13c7 (r13c7) and mouse 13c7 (m13c7)) were used because AMG785 causes anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation in those species.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 561Source ↗ OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
No initial data on prolonged treatment and vascular calcification or atherosclerosis; mechanistic studies added during review
Why: Weight of evidence shows no mechanistic link between sclerostin inhibition and vascular calcification or atherosclerosis · Weight of evidence
“The applicant did not provide data on the effect of prolonged romosozumab treatment on vascular calcification in normal and diseased vasculature such as in the atherosclerosis mouse model. As such, it is not clear, if a sclerostin specific antibody would possibly amplify the atherosclerotic effects.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗ “A weight of evidence assessment of all available non-clinical data indicates no obvious mechanistic association between sclerostin inhibition and vascular calcification or promotion of atherosclerosis, in normal and/or diseased tissue. Further non-clinical testing is, thus, not likely to contribute to the overall benefit / risk assessment in humans.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗