Study lengthAccepted
No 6-month repeat-dose toxicity study in the non-rodent (cynomolgus monkey)
Why: ICH S6(R1) allows deviation when scientifically justified; justification agreed in EMA scientific advice · Within the guideline
“Even though ICH M3(S2) specifies that in the EU/EEA 6-months studies in rodents and non-rodents are required, ICH S6(R1) specifies that there might also be derivations from this principle when scientifically justified. Justification on this aspect was provided in the scientific advice procedure EMA/H/SA/3363/1/2016/I, 21 July 2016.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No female reproduction studies; male fertility and early embryonic development study only
Why: Hemophilia A and B occur almost exclusively in males · Other reason
“Marstacimab was not tested in reproduction studies in female animals because hemophilia A and B occur almost exclusively in males.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 79Source ↗ “The absences of other than male FEED studies in this submission is acceptable, no concerns were identified on the scope of the submitted developmental and reproductive toxicity studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 52Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies for chronic prophylaxis; weight-of-evidence assessment with 26-week repeat-dose data
Why: Weight of evidence indicates low carcinogenic risk · Weight of evidence
“However, a thorough weight of evidence evaluation, in combination with data from the repeat dose toxicity studies, which included exposure to marstacimab up to 26 weeks, does not suggest any carcinogenic potential.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ “In summary, the weight of evidence indicates the carcinogenic risk of marstacimab is low and additional studies are not warranted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 52Source ↗ Juvenile toxAcceptedBeyond the letter
No juvenile animal study; adolescent-age monkeys in the 3-month study cited instead
Why: Some monkeys in the 3-month study were of age aligned with adolescent patients · Weight of evidence
“However, the Applicant argued that in the 3-month repeat-dose toxicity Study 20062114 in Cynomolgus monkeys, the age of some of the animals aligned with the age of adolescent patients (monkeys were 3.7 to 7.2 years at dosing initiation).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗ “Considering non-clinical aspects, a sufficient justification was provided why no juvenile toxicity studies were conducted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 52Source ↗