CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity study for chronic inflammatory indications; weight-of-evidence assessment with ECAC concurrence
Why: Rodents not pharmacologically relevant; low malignancy risk by weight of evidence; labeling and postmarketing malignancy monitoring · No relevant species · Weight of evidence
“A carcinogenicity study with long-term antagonism of IL23p19 in rodents will not be informative because rodents are not a pharmacologically relevant species. Concurrence has been received from the Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee of CDER that a 2-year rodent carcinogenicity study is not needed.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 54Source ↗ “Therefore, no additional nonclinical studies are recommended to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of risankizumab. Adequate labeling based on animal data from the sponsor and from literature as well as post-marketing patient monitoring of malignancy will be sufficient at this time.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 55Source ↗ Juvenile toxAcceptedBeyond the letter
No dedicated juvenile toxicity study; infants in the monkey ePPND study followed for six months instead
Why: No risankizumab-related effects in infant monkeys up to six months of age in the ePPND study · Weight of evidence
“In the ePPND study infants were observed for six months post-partum, no dedicated juvenile toxicology studies were carried out and this is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 25Source ↗