CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity studies for chronic SLE therapy; literature weight of evidence suggests increased malignancy risk from IFNAR blockade
Why: No binding to murine IFNAR1; likely increased carcinogenicity risk followed clinically and addressed in the RMP · No relevant species · Weight of evidence · Human data
“Carcinogenicity studies with anifrolumab were not conducted. Anifrolumab does not bind to murine IFNAR1 and does not inhibit the biological activity of murine IFN-α.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗ “Based on the weight of evidence, treatment with anifrolumab is likely associated with an increased carcinogenicity risk that has been followed throughout the clinical development programme and addressed in the RMP (see Section 2.7), and thus, no further animal studies are necessary (SmPC section 5.3).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗ DARTCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
No dedicated embryo-foetal development study, and no justification provided for omitting it
Why: Limitations of the NHP model, no other pharmacologically responsive species and confounding SLE disease background · No relevant species
“A justification for not performing embryo-foetal developmental toxicity evaluation with anifrolumab was not provided.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ “Due to limitations of the NHP model, lack of other pharmacologically responsive species, possible species-differences, and the underlying confounding disease background in SLE patients, the CHMP concluded that further animal studies are unlikely to provide clinically meaningful data to inform about the risk to reproduction in this patient population.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗