DARTAccepted
No animal reproductive or developmental toxicity studies; weight-of-evidence assessment instead
Why: Weight-of-evidence approach per ICH S6(R1) and ICH S9 · Within the guideline · Weight of evidence
“Embryo-fetal developmental toxicology studies were not conducted with retifanlimab. Rather, consistent with the alternative approach to providing information on the potential for reproductive toxicity described in ICH S6(R1) and ICH S9, the Applicant provided a weight-of-evidence assessment of the potential reproductive toxicity of retifanlimab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 29Source ↗ “The lack of carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproductive and developmental studies were adequately justified.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 51Source ↗ Efficacy modelAcceptedBeyond the letter
No in vivo proof-of-concept models; mode of action supported in vitro only
Why: Not needed given experience with PD-1 inhibitors · Class precedent
“The mode of action of retifanlimab was supported by in vitro studies. No in vivo models were presented to demonstrate proof of concept.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 49Source ↗ “These are not considered needed based on the experience with PD-1 inhibitors.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 49Source ↗