SpeciesAccepted
No relevant toxicology species; short-term toxicity study in rat rather than NHP
Why: Viral target; no relevant toxicological species; no off-target effects expected; avoids unnecessary NHP use · No relevant species · Within the guideline · Other reason
“It was therefore agreed that, as no relevant toxicological species exists and no off-target effects were expected in neither NHPs nor in rats, the use of the rat is supported from a 3R perspective in order to avoid unnecessary use of NHPs.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No dedicated reproductive and developmental toxicity studies
Why: ICH S6(R1): exogenous (viral) target; not indicated for females of reproductive potential · Within the guideline · Other reason
“In accordance with ICH S6(R1), DART studies are generally not needed for biologics to exogenous targets.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 179Source ↗ “Lastly, MK-1654 is not indicated for use in females of reproductive potential.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 179Source ↗ Juvenile toxAccepted
No juvenile animal studies despite a neonatal and infant indication
Why: Extensive paediatric clinical data; ICH S11 · Human data · Within the guideline
“Additionally, at the current timepoint extensive clinical data exists from the paediatric population and juvenile animal study is therefore not expected to provide any added safety value in accordance with ICH S11.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗