SpeciesVerdict not stated
Chimpanzee the only relevant species; exploratory studies in cynomolgus monkey used surrogate antibody HuMab-CD38
Why: Daratumumab does not bind CD38 of species typically used for toxicology testing · No relevant species
“Daratumumab binds to human and chimpanzee CD38, but not to CD38 of species typically used for nonclinical toxicology testing, ie, mouse, rat, rabbit, pig, and cynomolgus and rhesus monkey. Therefore, another anti-CD38 mAb, HuMab-CD38, that binds human and cynomolgus monkey CD38 was also characterized and used in some exploratory studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 15Source ↗ Study lengthVerdict not stated
No chronic toxicity study conducted
“No chronic toxicity testing has been conducted with daratumumab.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 7Source ↗ DARTAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No developmental and reproductive toxicity studies; testing not feasible in chimpanzee and surrogate monkey studies limited by anaemia and ADAs
Why: No feasible relevant species; majority of patients beyond reproductive age; included as missing information in the RMP · No relevant species · Other reason
“Developmental and reproductive toxicity testing is not feasible in chimpanzees. The use of a surrogate antibody in cynomolgus monkeys was considered, but anaemia and formation of ADAs limit the dosages and duration of any additional studies in this species.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗ “In addition, as the majority of patient population is beyond reproductive age it is therefore acknowledged that such studies are not deemed necessary for marketing authorisation however in order to address the whole population studied, reproductive and developmental toxicity is included as missing information in the RMP (see discussion on clinical safety).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No NOAEL established in the surrogate HuMab-CD38 cynomolgus monkey study
“A NOAEL was not established in this study.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗