CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity (or genotoxicity) studies; carcinogenicity requirement waived by the division
Why: Sponsor's weight-of-evidence justification, reviewed by the division · Weight of evidence
“Genetox and carcinogenicity studies were not conducted. The division waived the carcinogenicity study requirement after a review of the Sponsor’s Weight of Evidence justification (see review by Barbara Wilcox dated April 19, 2022).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review (BLA 761463, original application, approved Sep 2026), p. 183Source ↗ Safety marginAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No NOAEL for bone effects in rat; lowest bone-effect doses gave exposures below human AUC at the MRHD
Why: Agency added a labeling subsection because of the adverse bone effects in the rat toxicology study
“The lowest effect doses for adverse effects on bone in the 12- and 26-week rat studies (10 and 30 mg/kg, respectively) were associated with apitegromab exposures (AUC) lower than that in humans at the MRHD.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review (BLA 761463, original application, approved Sep 2026), p. 170Source ↗ “The Applicant had not proposed inclusion of this subsection; however, because of the adverse effects on bone that were observed in the rat toxicology study, the Agency added this subsection per 21 CFR 201.57(c)(14)(ii).”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review (BLA 761463, original application, approved Sep 2026), p. 303Source ↗ DARTQuestioned
Rabbit embryo-fetal study low-dose findings attributed to possible endotoxin contamination of the dose formulation, not clearly established
“All findings in the LD group were thought to be attributable to the presence of endotoxin contamination in the dose formulation, but this was not clearly established as a cause.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review (BLA 761463, original application, approved Sep 2026), p. 183Source ↗ Juvenile toxQuestioned
3-week SC juvenile rat study (PNDs 7 to 28) assessed bone only by femur length and routine histopathology
“A 3-week juvenile rat study with subcutaneous (SC) dosing from PNDs 7 to 28 was conducted to support dosing of pediatric patients less than 2 years of age. There were no apparent effects on juvenile development; however, the assessment of possible bone effects consisted only of femur length measurement and routine histopathology.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review (BLA 761463, original application, approved Sep 2026), p. 184Source ↗