CarcinogenicityAccepted
No carcinogenicity studies; absence justified by weight of evidence
Why: Weight-of-evidence argumentation, in line with the relevant guideline · Weight of evidence · Within the guideline
“The absence of carcinogenicity studies with zanubrutinib is justified based on a weight of evidence argumentation and in line with the relevant guideline.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 48Source ↗ OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
No in vivo excretion and metabolism (ADME) study in the dog, the non-rodent toxicology species
Why: Similar in vitro metabolic profiles across rat, dog and human; sufficient safety margins · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The omission of conducting ADME study of BGB-3111 in dog was justified in the next round of assessment by the following points: i) In vitro metabolic profiles (liver microsomes) were similar between rat, dog and humans.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗ “The justification was accepted and requesting a new in vivo ADME study in a non-rodent at this stage of development is not considered necessary.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗ Efficacy modelQuestioned
No ex vivo studies in primary lymphoma cells; limited efficacy in the systemic xenograft model
“However, since ex vivo studies using relevant primary lymphoma cells are missing and the efficacy in the systemic xenograft model appear limited, non-clinical proof of concept is not entirely convincing.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗