GLPAcceptedBeyond the letter
In vivo safety pharmacology studies not GLP-compliant (conducted before ICH S7A)
Why: Studies predated ICH S7A; GLP-compliant toxicity studies and clinical studies available · Weight of evidence · Human data
“Considering that the in vivo safety pharmacology studies have been performed prior to introduction of the ICH S7A guideline and in view of the available GLP-compliant single-and repeated dose toxicity studies and the clinical studies, the lack of GLP compliance is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 21Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
Rodent carcinogenicity NOAEL exposures below or only slightly above human exposure
Why: Low exposure multiples not a concern given the proposed indication · Serious disease
“Nevertheless, for both rodents, exposure margins obtained at the NOAEL for carcinogenicity are not existing (< 1 x) or rather low (1 – 2 x) with regard to the total concentrations or free concentrations of maribavir based on AUC.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 29Source ↗ “Considering the proposed indication, the low exposure multiples should not be a concern.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
26-week rat NOAEL exposure about 0.1 times total human AUC
“The NOAEL was set at 25 mg/kg/day resulting in exposures below human therapeutic exposures for total (approximately 0.1-times) and free unbound (approximately 0.5-times) maribavir based on AUC.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗ Safety marginAcceptedBeyond the letter
High clinical exposures (up to 1200 mg) not reached in nonclinical safety studies
Why: Exposure covered by the 800 mg and 1200 mg clinical studies · Human data
“These Cmax and AUC exposures have not generally been reached in the non-clinical safety studies, and thus, the non-clinical study package provides no support for this wide therapeutic window.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ “However, this exposure is covered by both the 800 mg and 1200 mg phase 2 studies and may therefore be acceptable based on clinical safety data.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗