Efficacy modelAcceptedBeyond the letter
No in vivo pharmacology studies; efficacy supported by in vitro TTR stabilisation only
Why: No animal model reproducing ATTR pathology was available · Other reason
“No in vivo studies were performed by the applicant. The CHMP considered that at the time of the preclinical development of tafamidis, an animal model of ATTR-PN that would reflect the clinical disease or resemble the pathology was not available, and that none of the transgenic animals described in the literature reproduce the pathology seen in ATTR patients.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 23Source ↗ “The CHMP agreed to the justification for absence of these studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 23Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
No long-term rodent carcinogenicity study in the original EU dossier; 26-week rasH2 mouse study only
Why: Severe, rare disease; no alert signals in nonclinical studies including rasH2 mouse · Serious disease · Rare disease / unmet need · Weight of evidence
“The carcinogenic potential of tafamidis was not studied in a long term rodent carcinogenicity study. This was considered acceptable given the severity and low incidence of the disease together with the fact that no alert signals were identified in the nonclinical studies conducted including the TgrasH2 mouse model.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 19Source ↗