Safety pharmacologyCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Cardiovascular/respiratory safety pharmacology in dogs without data showing dog relevance; female dog and guinea pig studies non-GLP
Why: Clinical data and no ECG or cardiovascular effects in the 52-week monkey study · Human data · Weight of evidence
“No in vitro affinity or potency studies have been presented in the primary pharmacology section to assess the relevance of dog for the cardiovascular and respiratory studies which is a deficiency.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 21Source ↗ “However, in light of clinical data and that no cardiovascular effects including ECG anomalies has been detected in the 52-week repeat dose toxicity study on Cynomolgus monkey, this limitation is not pursued.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 21Source ↗ OtherCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Several bioanalysis/toxicokinetic deficiencies across studies; only data from the most critical studies considered reliable
Why: Bioanalysis/TK data from the most critical studies considered reliable · Weight of evidence
“Several deficiencies were identified with regards to bioanalysis. Despite these deficiencies, it is concluded that bioanalysis/TK data from the most critical studies can be considered reliable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗