Safety marginQuestioned
Most repeat-dose exposure margins for elafibranor below one (CHMP recalculation); findings considered likely clinically relevant
“Based on the exposure margins recalculated by the CHMP, the observed findings in the preclinical studies are likely to be clinically relevant, as most of the exposure margins for the repeat-dose toxicity studies for elafibranor are <1”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ GenotoxicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
Clastogenic in vitro; accepted as non-genotoxic based on negative in vivo micronucleus, Comet and UDS assays
Why: Negative in vivo micronucleus, Comet and UDS assays with adequate exposure demonstrated by TK · Weight of evidence
“With regard to genotoxicity, elafibranor was conclusively demonstrated to be clastogenic in vitro; however, it produced negative results in two in vivo micronucleus tests, as well as in vivo Comet assay and UDS test in liver.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗ “Adequate exposure to elafibranor was demonstrated by means of TK measurements. Based on this, elafibranor is considered non-genotoxic in vivo.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteAcceptedBeyond the letter
Metabolite GFT3351 not major in rats, so in vivo genotoxicity not covered; only in vitro tests
Why: Negative results in two GLP-compliant in vitro genotoxicity tests · Weight of evidence
“It should be noted that GFT3351 is not formed as a major metabolite in rats, thus its genotoxicity in vivo is not considered to be covered by in vivo tests conducted with elafibranor in rats.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗ “However, the lack of genotoxic response in two GLP-compliant in vitro tests does not suggest concern regarding potential genotoxic properties of GFT3351.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗