Safety marginAcceptedBeyond the letter
No exposure margin at the NOEL for learning deficits in rat offspring of the pre- and postnatal development study
Why: Learning effects adverse only at exposures with a 21-fold margin at the NOAEL; clinical relevance considered low · Other reason
“No effects were seen in the 50 mg/kg/day group which is the NOEL for this effect. Based on AUC-exposure data at the NOEL of 50 mg/kg/day, no safety margin to human exposure at the MRHD exists for this effect.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 36Source ↗ “Considering that the findings on learning and memory in rats are adverse only at exposures with sufficient safety margin (21-fold at the NOAEL) to the human exposure at the maximum dose, the clinical relevance is considered to be low.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 37Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
Fertility and pre- and postnatal development studies without toxicokinetics; exposure estimated from rat repeat-dose studies
Why: Exposure estimated from rat repeat-dose toxicity data · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The study has not included a toxicokinetic analysis. Based on data from the repeated dose toxicity studies in rats, it is estimated that systemic exposure (AUC) in rats at 350 mg/kg/day was 21-fold human exposure.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗ “The package of developmental and reproductive toxicology studies is considered adequate.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗