Safety pharmacologyCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
In vitro hERG assay not conducted under GLP and had several deficiencies
Why: No QT prolongation potential in a dedicated clinical QT assessment · Human data
“Several deficiencies were evident in the hERG assay, which was not conducted under GLP conditions as per ICH S7B.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗ “However, given that nerandomilast did not show QT prolongation potential in a dedicated clinical QT assessment, the addition of a GLP in vitro hERG assay is not warranted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗ CarcinogenicityAccepted
Rat carcinogenicity high dose gave low exposure margins of 1.6 (males) and 2.2 (females) by AUC
Why: In line with the ICH S1(R1) addendum · Within the guideline
“The low exposure margins achieved in rats at the high dose of 2 mg/kg of 1.6 and 2.2 based on AUC in males and females was discussed and considered acceptable in line with ICH S1 (R1) addendum.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗ Juvenile toxAcceptedBeyond the letter
Definitive juvenile rat toxicity study deferred under the paediatric investigation plan; only non-GLP range-finder available
Why: Agreed deferral in the paediatric investigation plan · Other reason
“A definitive juvenile toxicity rat study is agreed in the PIP, with the completion of this study deferred to September 2025.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗ “Conclusions The nonclinical package submitted for nerandomilast for MAA is acceptable.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 48Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
26-week rat NOAEL exposure equivalent (1-fold) to human Cmax and AUC at the MRHD
“In the 26-week repeat-dose toxicity study in rats, the NOAEL of 2 mg/kg/day resulted in steady state Cmax and AUC0-24 levels that were 1-fold (equivalent) to human levels at the MRHD.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗