GLPAcceptedBeyond the letter
Embryo-fetal development assessed only in a non-GLP dose range-finding rat study
Why: Clear developmental findings at exposures below clinical exposure at 13.5 mg · Weight of evidence
“The Applicant conducted a non-GLP dose range-finding embryo-fetal development study in Sprague-Dawley rats. Because this study demonstrated clear findings at exposure levels below the clinical exposure at the 13.5 mg human dose, this study was sufficient to characterize the potential developmental risk.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 36Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No fertility and early embryonic development studies
Why: Advanced-cancer indication and teratogenicity already shown; in line with ICH S9 · Within the guideline · Serious disease
“Due to the indication of pemigatinib and the teratogenic effects observed in the range-finding embryo-foetal toxicity study, the lack of fertility and early embryonic developmental studies is acceptable and is in line with the recommendations given in the ICH S9 guideline.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No pre- and postnatal development study
Why: Intended indication; in line with ICH S9 · Within the guideline · Serious disease
“No studies on pre-postnatal development have been conducted with pemigatinib. The lack of pre-postnatal developmental studies is acceptable in view of the intended indication for Pemazyre and is in line with the ICH S9 guideline.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗ Juvenile toxAcceptedBeyond the letter
No juvenile animal toxicity studies
Why: Adult-only indication; full paediatric waiver granted · Other reason
“Since the currently intended indication of Pemazyre is for treatment of adults, the lack of juvenile toxicity studies in animals is acceptable; pemigatinib was granted a full paediatric waiver for development for the treatment of either cholangiocarcinoma or urothelial carcinoma (EMA decision P/0386/2018).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No safety margin for soft tissue mineralisation (rats, monkeys) and ophthalmic findings
“There are no safety margins for the soft tissue mineralisation in rats and monkeys and ophthalmic findings for up to 90 days.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗