GenotoxicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
In vitro chromosome aberration assay inadequate: 5-hour treatment only, no ~24-hour continuous treatment without activation
Why: Weight of evidence suggests gepirone is neither genotoxic nor carcinogenic · Weight of evidence
“The in vitro chromosomal aberration assay was inadequate because although gepirone was negative for 5-hour treatment, with and without metabolic activation, this negative finding (without activation) should have been followed up with a study using continuous treatment with gepirone (without activation) for ~ 24 hours (1.5 cell doubling times) in accordance with current guidelines.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗ “Since the weight of evidence suggests that gepirone is neither genotoxic nor carcinogenic, we are not requiring that this study be repeated; however, it will have to be repeated if it is to be included in product labeling.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 3Source ↗ Safety marginAcceptedBeyond the letter
Exposure multiples expressed on body surface area (mg/m2) rather than AUC ratios
Why: Pharmacokinetic and drug metabolism data support body-surface-area comparison · Pharmacology or kinetics
“It is also noted that although the current practice is to express exposure multiples in the labeling based on AUC ratios, the pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism data provide a strong rationale for expressing exposure multiples in the toxicity studies on the basis of body surface area (Mg/M2”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 22Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
Pre- and postnatal development study did not establish a no-effect dose for offspring effects
“Increased offspring mortality during the first 4 days after birth and persistent offspring growth retardation were observed at all doses. The no-effect dose for fetal effects was not determined in this study.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 133Source ↗