SpeciesCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Cynomolgus monkey used as non-rodent species without initial cross-reactivity data; CHMP questioned its pharmacological relevance
Why: Monkey previously used for tofacitinib; builds on prior experience and data from other JAK inhibitors · Class precedent
“Indeed, the pharmacological relevance of the monkey was therefore questionable, as no cross-reactivity studies with abrocitinib had been presented.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ “Overall, given the historical context and the possibility to build on previous experience and data from other JAK inhibitors, the use of monkey in the development programme was considered sufficiently justified by CHMP.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 46Source ↗ Juvenile toxQuestioned
No NOAEL in the juvenile rat study: bone malformations and fractures at all doses; mechanism unexplained
“Because adverse bone findings were noted at all dose levels, a NOAEL could not be established.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 40Source ↗ “Thus, there is a remaining uncertainty regarding the developmental bone effects, which should receive further clinical attention.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ GenotoxicityAcceptedBeyond the letter
Positive (aneugenic) in vitro micronucleus assay accepted on a negative in vivo rat micronucleus assay
Why: Negative in vivo micronucleus; no genotoxic risk at the clinical dose of 200 mg QD · Weight of evidence
“Abrocitinib was positive in an in vitro micronucleus assay and determined to be an aneugen in a follow-up study; however, it was not genotoxic in an in vivo micronucleus assay in rats.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗ “Collectively, the genotoxicity studies presented do not indicate a genotoxic risk for abrocitinib at the proposed clinical dose of 200 mg QD.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ Safety marginAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No margin for rat thymoma: benign thymomas in females from the lowest dose, at low exposure margins
Why: Human relevance unclear; thymoma data included in SmPC section 5.3 · Other reason
“However, thymomas were evident in females already from the lowest dose, with low margins of exposure to human exposure.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ “Nevertheless, given the unclear human relevance of the thymoma findings, the applicant included data in section 5.3 of the SmPC.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 48Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteVerdict not stated
Mutagenic impurity PF-07216658 controlled by a benchmark-modelled PDE of 1.36 μg/kg/day (170 ppm)
“Based on benchmark modelling, a PDE which was established at 1.36 μg/kg/day corresponding to a concentration limit of 170 ppm.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 42Source ↗