Safety marginAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No exposure margin for enmetazobactam liver effects; combination-study NOAELs below MRHD exposure in dogs and rats
Why: No margin in rats or for dog NOAELs, and liver effects seen clinically; findings described in the SmPC · Human data
“For the NOAELs in the combination studies of enmetazobactam given together with cefepime, the margin to the exposure at the MRHD was 0.71 in dogs and 0.86 or lower in rats.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗ “Anyway, as there is no margin to the clinical exposure for any of the dose levels in rats or for the NOAELs for corresponding effects in dogs, and risk for increased liver enzymes and liver effects has been observed in the clinic, information on the non-clinical liver effects have been included in the SmPC.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 29Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
Male fertility study did not continue dosing through mating until conception, deviating from ICH S5(R3)
Why: Dosing shortfall was less than 3 days; unlikely to change the male fertility outcome · Other reason
“Note: The study design for this study deviated from recommendations in the ICH S5(R3) Guideline. Males in the study were administered vehicle or test article for 1-month during the premating period, but dosing was not continued during the mating period at least until verification of conception as recommended in the Guideline.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 102Source ↗ “Conception for untreated females mated with treated males occurred over a range of 2.0 to 2.7 days after the start of mating, so the deficiency in dosing duration was less than 3 days. This minor deviation was considered unlikely to produce a different study outcome with regard to male fertility.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 102Source ↗ OtherVerdict not stated
Combination toxicity studies used an enmetazobactam/cefepime ratio different from the clinical ratio
Why: Exact ratio not defined during preclinical development
“The Applicant acknowledges that the combination ratio was dissimilar between non-clinical and clinical studies, as the exact ratio was not defined during the preclinical development.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 38Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
Exposure margins for enmetazobactam in reproductive and developmental studies very low or undetermined
“The safety margins from animal to human exposure ratio for enmetazobactam in the reproduction and development studies were very low or undetermined.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 33Source ↗