CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No 2-year rat carcinogenicity study; weight-of-evidence assessment instead, with 26-week Tg-rasH2 mouse study postapproval
Why: Endogenous compounds, years of clinical experience, no tumorigenicity in 26-week rat and 13-week dog studies · Weight of evidence · Human data · Pharmacology or kinetics
“The Applicant submitted a weight-of-evidence assessment in lieu of a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study. The Agency agreed with the Applicant’s weight-of-evidence assessment that a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study would not add value”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 159Source ↗ “Provided the endogenous nature of the compounds, up to 10 years clinical experience of the use of the compounds, and that no evidence of tumorigenicity observed in the 26-week toxicity study in juvenile rats and in the 13-week toxicity study in dogs, it is agreed that the potential for doxecitine and doxribtimine to cause carcinogenicity is low and a two-year carcinogenicity study can be waived.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 41Source ↗ Study lengthAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No 9-month chronic dog study before approval (dog studies up to 13 weeks); deferred to postmarketing
“The Applicant did not conduct a 9-month dog toxicity study, carcinogenicity studies, and a rat PPND study with doxecitine and doxribtimine.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 82Source ↗ “The Agency also confirmed that the 39-week repeat-dose toxicity study in dogs could be conducted as a PMR.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 140Source ↗ DARTAcceptedBeyond the letter
No rat pre- and postnatal development study
Why: Negative embryofetal and juvenile rat studies at high exposure margins · Weight of evidence
“Based on the negative findings in the EFD and juvenile toxicity studies in rats at high exposure margins, a rat PPND study is considered unwarranted.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 82Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAcceptedBeyond the letter
No dedicated safety pharmacology studies; cardiovascular endpoints in 13-week dog study and functional assessments in toxicity studies
Why: Endogenous nature of the nucleosides; no findings in toxicity studies at 25-fold or higher exposure · Pharmacology or kinetics · Weight of evidence
“No dedicated in vitro and in vivo safety pharmacology studies were conducted due to the endogenous nature of doxecitine and doxribtimine.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ “The exposure margin of these toxicology studies were at least 25-fold higher than human exposure based on baseline-adjusted AUC0-24. The safety pharmacology is considered sufficiently addressed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Genotoxic impurity alpha-hydroxythymidine above the ICH M7 TTC; mutagenic/clastogenic characterization required postmarketing
“This exposure level represents approximately -fold exceedance of the 1.5 μg TTC for genotoxic impurities established in ICH M7(R2) guidance.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 82Source ↗ “Postmarket assessments will be required to characterize the mutagenic and clastogenic potential of alpha-hydroxythymidine in the presence of doxecitine and doxribtimine.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 82Source ↗