GLPAcceptedBeyond the letter
General and reproductive toxicity largely from 1970s legacy studies not in full GLP compliance, many without toxicokinetics
Why: No significant issues compromising study quality or data interpretation found on review · Other reason
“Many of the nonclinical legacy general toxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity studies were completed in the 1970s, before the good laboratory practice (GLP) regulation was implemented; therefore, they are not in full compliance with GLP.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 135Source ↗ “Nevertheless, after evaluating the study reports, I did not identify any significant issues that would compromise the quality of the studies or the interpretation of the data; therefore, these studies are considered adequate and acceptable for the NDA review.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 135Source ↗ Safety marginCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
No safety margin between animal NOAEL exposures for seizures and clinical blood levels
Why: Published clinical literature showed no clear seizure risk in humans · Human data
“The Agency expressed concern over the lack of a safety margin between the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) exposures for seizures in animals and the blood levels already attained in clinical trials.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 134Source ↗ “The Agency agreed after review of the submitted data that there did not appear to be a clear seizure risk associated with viloxazine in humans.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 134Source ↗