CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Only a rasH2 mouse study before approval; 2-year rat carcinogenicity study deferred to a post-approval commitment
Why: Agreed with CHMP and PDCO; ongoing study referenced in SmPC section 5.3 and RMP
“A two-year carcinogenicity study in rats is planned to be conducted post-approval. This is acceptable and in agreement with feedback received from CHMP and PDCO.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 49Source ↗ “Furthermore, it is recommended that lack of complete non-clinical data on carcinogenicity is considered in the RMP, and that the reference to the ongoing carcinogenicity study in rats is clearly presented in SmPC section 5.3.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 35Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
No standard fertility and early embryonic development study; fertility assessed within juvenile and adult repeat-dose studies
Why: Fertility integrated into juvenile rat studies; reproductive organ histopathology examined in adult and juvenile studies · Weight of evidence
“A standard fertility and early embryonic development study was not conducted. The sponsor’s justification was that assessment of fertility was integrated into the juvenile rat toxicity studies and reproductive organ histopathology was examined in the adult and juvenile toxicity studies.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 8Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No exposure margin at the 39-week monkey NOAEL: AUC identical to targeted patient exposure
“At the NOAEL, systemic exposure (AUC0-24h) to risdiplam in males and females was identical to the targeted exposure in patients.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 31Source ↗