GLPCriticised but accepted
Most single- and repeat-dose studies non-GLP; only two 13-week GLP bridging studies (rat, dog) considered pivotal
Why: Advanced-cancer indication under ICH S9; supportive toxicity profile consistent with marketed anti-VEGFR products · Within the guideline · Class precedent
“All other single- or repeated-dose studies are claimed as non-GLP compliant. Given the indication was in the scope of ICH S9 guideline, the two 13-week GLP compliant studies could be considered as the only pivotal studies in the submitted non-clinical package.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 48Source ↗ “However, it is acknowledged that an extended toxicity profile is consistent with those obtained for already marketed anti-VEGFR1, 2 and 3 products, and the use of toxicity profile obtained from the supportive studies therefore is accepted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗ DARTAccepted
Embryo-fetal development studied in rat only (no second species)
Why: Clear malformations and embryo-fetal lethality at low doses in rat (ICH S9) · Within the guideline
“The absence of second species in the embryo-foetal development studies can be accepted as clearly positive results for the induction of malformations and embryo-foetal lethality was demonstrated after administration of low doses of fruquintinib in rat studies (ICH S9).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 49Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
No exposure margin: 13-week NOAEL AUC ratios 0.3 (rat) and 0.05 (dog); EFD 0.02
“The safety margins (total AUC ratio) derived from the GLP-compliant 13-week rat and dog study NOAELs are 0.3 and 0.05, respectively. For the embryo-foetal development, the safety factor derived from the NOEAL is 0.02.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 44Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAcceptedBeyond the letter
CNS and respiratory safety pharmacology studies non-GLP; cardiovascular exposure margins very limited
Why: Large clinical experience addresses uncertainties from limited exposure margins · Human data
“Similarly, the dedicated study to assess respiratory function (0849PH1) was declared as non-GLP compliant; fruquintinib had no effect on respiratory system.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗ “Nevertheless, the current clinical experience is sufficient to address the uncertainties raised by the limited margins of exposures and this issue need to be assessed in clinical safety with the current large clinical experience.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗