Safety marginVerdict not stated
No safety margin: toxicity in rats and monkeys at exposures below clinical exposure
“Non-clinical safety program revealed a high toxicity of selinexor. Some tissues were mainly affected (reproductive systems, CNS-mediated gastrointestinal system…) and clinical findings reported (food consumption and body weight reduction, mortality). No safety margin could be established for human studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗ DARTVerdict not stated
Embryo-fetal development studied in rat only (NOAEL at 0.02x clinical exposure); no second species and no fertility study
Why: Findings in rats make a second species unnecessary (applicant)
“In an embryofoetal developmental toxicity study in rats the NOAEL value for maternal toxicity and embryo-foetal development was established at 0.25 mg/Kg/day and the resultant exposures measured represent a margin of exposure of 0.02 from the clinical dose. The Applicant has suggested that based on the findings in rats that studies in a second species are not warranted.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 30Source ↗ OtherQuestioned
Rat 13-week NOAEL set by the applicant considered poorly justified given severity of findings
“As such, NOAEL was reported to be 0.25 mg/Kg/day for males and 1 mg/Kg/day for females, which was hardly justified given the severity of the findings reported in the study report.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 28Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Metabolite structures only partly characterised; confirmation study committed post-authorisation
“As of metabolites, partial information was provided. Therefore, the applicant committed to conduct additional post-authorisation studies to confirm the structure of the metabolites.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗ “The Applicant has committed to submit results from a metabolite characterisation study, by Q1 2021 (CHMP Recommendation).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 32Source ↗