RecoveryQuestioned
No recovery phase in the 4-week rat and monkey toxicity studies
“In the 2-week rat study the effects were mainly reversible, but it is not known whether this is the case after a longer treatment period. It is not understood why the applicant did not include a recovery phase in the 4-week studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
Rat 4-week NOAEL exposures below clinical exposure for the main metabolites
“In the rat 4-week study, the AUC exposure margins at NOAEL were 0.1/0.2-fold (males/females) for GS-441524, and 0.2/0.4-fold (males/females) for GS-704277.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗ Efficacy modelQuestioned
Rhesus SARS-CoV-2 efficacy study did not establish the natural disease course
“Unfortunately, the sponsor failed to adequately establish the natural progression of the disease in this animal model. Therefore, results from this study are generally not sufficient to draw any definitive conclusions concerning RDV’s potential to treat COVID-19 in humans.”
✓ VerifiedFDA pharmacology/toxicology review, p. 13Source ↗ DARTQuestioned
Female rat fertility effects attributed by the applicant to maternal stress; argument not accepted
“Taken together, it cannot be agreed that the data are solid enough to conclude that the adverse effects in female rats are consequences of maternal stress and not human relevant as argued by the Applicant.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 45Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteVerdict not stated
No dedicated toxicity studies with remdesivir metabolites beyond a non-GLP Ames test of GS-441524
“The metabolite GS-441524 was tested in a non-GLP reverse mutation assay and concluded as negative. Apart from this in vitro study, no other dedicated studies were performed with remdesivir metabolites.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 42Source ↗