OtherAcceptedBeyond the letter
Nonclinical package consists of older studies conducted to support the veterinary product
Why: Data from the veterinary studies considered valid to support the clinical formulation · Other reason
“The preclinical investigations with TCBZ were conducted to support the veterinary product for treatment of fluke diseases. However, the data from these studies are considered valid to support the safety of clinical formulation of TCBZ for the treatment of fascioliasis.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 37Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No stand-alone hERG assay; most safety pharmacology studies non-GLP; dog QTc prolongation of unclear relevance
Why: Clinical relevance of dog QT prolongation unclear; thorough QT study to be conducted postmarketing
“As part of the Safety Pharmacology assessments, a stand-alone hERG channel inhibition assay was not conducted with TCBZ. However, in a series of other non-GLP Safety Pharmacology studies, no adverse effects were observed”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 37Source ↗ “In sum, from a Pharmacology/Toxicology perspective, the clinical relevance of the transient QT prolongation seen in the repeat-dose study as well as in the single dose safety Pharmacology study in dogs is unclear, particularly in the absence of cardiac monitoring in the clinical trials, and hence a post-marketing thorough QT study in the clinic will be conducted as recommended by the clinical review team.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗ OtherCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Dietary rat repeat-dose study with group-housed animals and no toxicokinetics
“While, overall the repeat-dose study in rats seems adequate, the study design is, to some extent, flawed, as 5 animals per treatment group were housed together in a cage.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 54Source ↗ DARTQuestioned
Rat 2-generation study doses too low to assess postnatal toxicity; no toxicokinetics in any reproductive study
“the study are likely inadequate to indicate whether the drug causes postnatal developmental toxicity apart from the observed body weight loss in F2 offspring. No TK analyses were conducted in any of the reproductive toxicology studies in rats or rabbits.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 39Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
Rat repeat-dose NOAEL of 0.75 mg/kg/day is below the proposed clinical dose
“The NOAEL was determined to be 10 ppm (corresponding to a mean of 0.75 mg/kg/day dose) which is below the proposed clinical dose based on a body surface area comparison.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 52Source ↗