CarcinogenicityAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
No carcinogenicity study before approval; deferred to a postapproval study as agreed at the pre-IND meeting
Why: Agreed at the pre-IND meeting · Other reason
“As agreed at the pre-IND meeting held on August 22, 2018 (PIND 139923), the Applicant will conduct a carcinogenicity study postapproval.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 141Source ↗ Juvenile toxCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
No juvenile toxicity studies for a paediatric product; toxicology animals' ages did not cover patients from 12 months
Why: Previously agreed · Other reason
“No juvenile toxicity studies were conducted, although lonafarnib is in this application intended for children. The lack of juvenile toxicity studies has previously been agreed upon. In addition, the age of the animals in the toxicological studies corresponded to human ages from approximately 12 years and older and did not cover the ages of the intended paediatric patients (from 12 months and older).”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗ Safety marginVerdict not stated
Chronic rat NOAEL at 0.06 (males) and 0.36 (females) times human AUC
“The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was 15 mg/kg/day. AUC0-24hr at 15 mg/kg/day was 2.31 ȝJ·hr/mL in males and 14.1 ȝJ·hr/mL in females, which are 0.06 and 0.36 times the human AUC0-24hr (39.1 ȝJ·hr/mL) observed with 150 mg/m2 BID, respectively.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 66Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Major human metabolite M33 below 50% of human exposure in rats, the species used for pivotal embryo-fetal studies
Why: Lonafarnib already teratogenic at clinically relevant exposures; SmPC section 4.6 recommendation sufficient · Weight of evidence
“In the rat toxicity studies, mainly the M33 is lower than 50% of the human exposure. Since monkeys were not used in the pivotal EFD studies, the low exposure of M33 in rats is uncertain which may impact the results and conclusion of the reproductive toxicity studies.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ “However, since Lonafarnib has shown reproductive toxicity in animals, demonstrating teratogenic potential at clinically relevant exposures, the current recommendation in section 4.6 of the SmPC is considered sufficient.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 43Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteCriticised but acceptedBeyond the letter
Impurity Compound W not tested on its own for genotoxicity; QSAR assessment used instead
Why: QSAR assessment using statistical and expert-rule based methodology · Other reason
“To better investigate the genotoxic potential of Compound W, the substance itself should have been tested and preferably in a bacterial reverse mutation assay.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗ “The QSAR analysis report was submitted upon request in the first round of the procedure. The assessment included a statistical and an expert-rule based methodology. It is agreed that Compound W can be considered non-mutagenic.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 47Source ↗