Safety marginQuestioned
No exposure margin: animal-to-human exposure ratios below one at the highest doses in 3-month rat and dog studies
“The animal-to-human exposure ratios at the highest daily dose of 8 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg tested in the 3-month rat and dog study, respectively, are low (<1). Thus, interpretation of the observed adverse effects is difficult since the exposure multiples following repeat dose administration of erdafitinib are much lower than the AUC in humans at the intended clinical dose of 8 or 9 mg.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 40Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyAccepted with a conditionBeyond the letter
Dog cardiovascular NOAEL only 2.4-fold clinical exposure; QT effect within clinical exposure range
Why: Risk addressed in the RMP and SmPC section 5.3
“The NOAEL was 2.5 mg/kg with Cmax of 12.4 ng/ml representing 2.4-fold of the expected clinical exposure which is not considered acceptable as a safety margins. As this effect appears in the clinical exposure range it is included in the RMP part II module SII and the SmPC section 5.3.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 39Source ↗ DARTAccepted
No fertility or pre- and postnatal development studies; embryo-fetal studies in rats only
Why: ICH S9 and ICH S5(R3) for an advanced cancer indication · Within the guideline · Serious disease
“In accordance with ICHS9 and ICHS5 (R3) guidelines no studies on fertility and early development and on pre- and postnatal development have been performed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 34Source ↗ “Fertility and early embryonic development studies were not conducted or required to support an advanced cancer indication.”
✓ VerifiedFDA multi-discipline review, p. 78Source ↗ Safety pharmacologyVerdict not stated
No dedicated CNS safety pharmacology study; CNS endpoints included in toxicology studies
Why: CNS endpoints included in the toxicology studies
“No dedicated safety pharmacology study was performed to evaluate CNS effects of erdafitinib. CNS endpoints were included in the toxicology studies and the effects are described in Toxicology section.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 27Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteAccepted
Potential genotoxic impurities controlled to non-mutagenic impurity limits (ICH Q3A) under ICH S9
Why: Erdafitinib not genotoxic; advanced cancer indication within ICH S9 · Within the guideline · Serious disease
“Erdafitinib (itself not genotoxic) is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, to which ICH S9 applies. As such, potential genotoxic impurities may be controlled according to the limits for non-mutagenic impurities in ICH Q3A.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 18Source ↗