Safety marginVerdict not stated
Chronic rat NOAEL exposure only approximated clinical AUC at the maximum recommended dose
“Exposures at the NOAEL approximated the clinical exposures at the MRHD of 400 mg BID, based on AUC.”
✓ VerifiedFDA integrated review, p. 121Source ↗ Impurity or metaboliteCriticised but accepted
Impurities qualified with a generic 4-fold dose margin, which the reviewer found unexplained
Why: Dose margins revised from results of study TXC1711 (ICH Q3A(R2)) · Within the guideline
“A generic acceptability criterium of 4 to regard impurities as qualified is not explained any further.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 56Source ↗ “Dose margins of rilzabrutinib impurities qualified under ICH Q3A(R2) were revised based on the results from study TXC1711. This is acknowledged and listed impurities (specifically PRN3232, PRN3590 and PRN1418) are considered qualified at their respective proposed specification levels.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 56Source ↗ Juvenile toxAcceptedBeyond the letter
Juvenile rat study programme dropped from the paediatric plan
Why: Paediatric waiver extended; not needed for an adult indication · Other reason
“A programme of juvenile animal studies was initiated in rats aged 10 days to support paediatric development of rilzabrutinib from 1 year of age, but subsequently deleted from the PIP due to extension of the waiver to patients below 10 years of age.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 42Source ↗ “It is agreed that additional JAS is not needed to support the current MAA for the treatment of adult patients.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 55Source ↗ DARTAccepted
Milk transfer and offspring toxicokinetics not assessed in the pre- and postnatal study
Why: ICH S5 does not strictly demand toxicokinetic assessment in maternal milk · Within the guideline
“Transfer of Rilzabrutinib into maternal milk was not assessed.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 42Source ↗ “It is agreed that ICH S5 (see 3.5.) does not strictly demand the toxicokinetic assessment of substances in maternal milk.”
✓ VerifiedEMA assessment report, p. 55Source ↗